Tag: Philanthropy

Posted on

When Hope Coexists With Uncertainty – Part II

This is Part 2 of the series.

End With Strategy

Hope as a Leadership Practice—Right Where You Are

Here’s what your team, your board, and your stakeholders are actually watching: not whether you’re certain about the future, but whether you’re steady in the present. And the steadiness they need isn’t false optimism. It’s clear-eyed leadership.

This is what that looks like:

When you acknowledge that the board’s caution makes sense—that staff exhaustion is real, that the landscape has genuinely shifted—you give everyone permission to be honest.  You create space where people can say “this is hard” without assuming it means they should quit.

When you protect your team’s energy by not asking them to generate false excitement about next year, you honor their intelligence and their humanity. You’re saying: I see how depleted you are. And here’s how we’re going to move forward in a way that doesn’t ask you to sacrifice yourself.

When you sit with your board and say, “Here’s what we learned. Here’s what’s different about the landscape. Here’s what we can control, and here’s what we can’t. And here’s how we’re going to proceed intentionally anyway”—that’s leadership.

This is hope as stewardship, not as cheerleading. It’s the difference between “Everything will be fine” and “This is genuinely hard, and here’s how we navigate it together.”

Making Decisions in the Fog

You’re being asked to plan next year. To commit. To set goals.  To schedule the gala. To budget. To lead.

  • Without knowing if the landscape will change.
  • Without knowing if sponsors will return.
  • Without knowing if honorees will participate.
  • Without knowing if your team will have more capacity next year.

You can’t wait for clarity. You have to decide anyway.

This is where clear-eyed hope becomes operational—and strategic.

Not “hope for the best.” But strategic hope—making intentional choices based on what you actually learned this year, not on what you hope will be different next year.

This might look like:

  • Building flexibility where you used to build certainty. If sponsor behavior is less predictable, design your revenue model to adapt. Don’t bet the event on one sponsor showing up.
  • Doubling down on what created real connection. If guests engaged deeply with the experience—if the room felt right—continue that. Not because you’re guaranteed it will raise more money, but because you know it’s working.
  • Being honest with your board about what’s possible. Not lowering ambition. Being clear about what’s in your control (execution, experience, mission alignment) and what isn’t (donor sentiment, sponsor availability, external economic shifts).
  • Protecting your team’s capacity as a strategic asset. If last year wore people down, next year’s planning has to account for that. You’re not asking them to work harder. You’re asking them to work smarter—and you’re designing the work around their actual capacity.

Getting clarity on the board’s role. Are they aligned around the event? Do they understand what they need to do to support it? If the answer is no, that’s information you need before you plan, not after.

When you can’t control the outcome, you control the approach. And the approach is where strategy lives.

What This Isn’t

Let’s be clear about what clear-eyed hope is not:

This is not toxic positivity. You don’t pretend the landscape is improving when it isn’t. You don’t tell your team “it will work out” without a real plan. You don’t smile through exhaustion and call it hope.

This is not resignation. You’re not accepting uncertain conditions as permanent. You’re not saying “nothing we do matters.” You’re saying “conditions are genuinely uncertain, and we’re going to move strategically anyway.”

This is not individual burden. Clear-eyed hope isn’t about one leader staying positive so everyone else can relax. It’s about a shared understanding—leader, board, staff—that we see the challenges clearly and we’re proceeding with intention because the mission requires it.

This is not spiritual bypassing. You’re not replacing strategy with faith. You’re building real plans, making real choices about what you can influence, and being honest about what you can’t.

Clear-eyed hope is this: 

Seeing the full reality of what you’re facing—the sponsor shifts, the experience expectations, the honoree hesitation, the team depletion—and deciding to move forward anyway because the work matters more than the guarantee.

On Exhaustion and Commitment

Here’s something that doesn’t get said enough in nonprofit spaces: you can be exhausted and still committed. Those two things can coexist.

Many leaders think exhaustion means they need to lower commitment. Step back. Rest. And sometimes that’s true.

But sometimes exhaustion means you need to change how you’re committed, not whether you are.

It might mean:

  • Protecting rest as a strategic asset, not a luxury
  • Delegating more, controlling less
  • Being honest with your board about capacity constraints
  • Changing the approach to the work, not abandoning it

Your team doesn’t need you to pretend they’re not tired. 

They need you to design next year around the reality that humans have limits—and to respect those limits as a feature of sustainable leadership, not a failure of commitment.

The work doesn’t stop because you’re depleted. But how the work happens can change.

What comes next?

As the applause fades and the numbers come in, you’re likely sitting with all of it at once. Real accomplishments. Real exhaustion. Real uncertainty.

That’s the exact place where clear-eyed hope lives.

Not waiting for better conditions. Not pretending the landscape is different than it is. But deciding, with full awareness of the challenges and constraints, that the work is worth the commitment anyway.

Clarity with forward motion.

You can’t guarantee next year’s outcome. But you can be intentional about the approach. You can stay grounded so your team has a foundation to stand on. You can align your board around what’s actually possible. You can protect capacity while still delivering.

And you can keep moving because the mission demands it—not because you’re optimistic about next year, but because you’re clear about what matters and you’re committed to proceeding anyway.

That’s hope. That’s real. And that’s what nonprofit leaders are doing right now.

The work demands it. So you show up, eyes open, decisions made, and move forward together.

Here’s to your success!

To revisit Part 1 of “When Hope Coexists With Uncertainty” please follow this link.

Monique

Posted on

When Hope Coexists With Uncertainty – Part I

This is Part 1 of a 2-part blog post series. Continue reading below, then visit Part 2 for the complete perspective.

Lead With Hope

The room was full. The applause was real. And still, something in you is doing the quiet math.

And despite the uncertainty that a new year often brings, many will rest with these truths: your gala was beautiful and the room felt just right. Guests showed up, engaged with the evening’s agenda, participated in your onsite fundraiser. The event ended on time.

But here are some other truths many must balance. Despite the rave reviews, your final net tells a slightly different story. The funding numbers still didn’t trend upward the way you needed them to.

Or perhaps this is one of the first times the event exceeded revenue goals—and your board is cautious about saying yes to another one. Their trepidation stems from knowing that while your team executed flawlessly, they are now so depleted they can barely think about what comes next. Nor do they want to.

And unless your board aligns around the work and your staff embraces it, you now have an inflection point that must be navigated with compassion.

Moreover, as your organization’s leader, you hold some quiet truths you’ve only shared with a few:

  • The fundraising landscape is shifting. Sponsors and partners have become less predictable.
  • The demand for experiences at events is growing—and so are the expectations that come with them.
  • Honorees are slower to say yes, and their participation carries great expectations.

What does this all mean? You must now reckon with knowing that success, exhaustion, and uncertainty can coexist.

This is where hope and uncertainty collide. And here’s what you might not expect: the greatest decisions are sometimes born out of this very collision.

On the False Choice

We’ve been taught to choose between two impossible positions: either everything is working (and if it’s not, it’s your problem to solve), or nothing will work (so why bother trying).

But you live in a third space. You navigate it every day—seeing the real constraints, the shifting landscape, the exhaustion on your team—and you still have to make decisions about next year.

That’s not optimism. That’s clarity with forward motion.

Hope doesn’t arrive when conditions improve. It’s not something you wait for. It’s what you do when conditions are uncertain and decisions still need to be made.

What Clear-Eyed Hope Actually Looks Like Right Now

In this moment—with board caution, staff depletion, sponsor unpredictability, and shifting donor behavior—clear-eyed hope isn’t a feeling. It’s a decision.

It’s deciding to commit to next year while acknowledging that you can’t control:

  • Whether sponsors will increase their commitments.
  • Whether guests will value experiences the way they used to.
  • Whether honorees will say yes or come with new expectations.

But it is deciding to proceed with intention anyway. Because the mission requires it.

This looks like:

  • Committing to strategy even though you can’t guarantee the funder will show up.
  • Planning the gala even though last year’s revenue fell short.
  • Protecting your team’s capacity even though you need them to deliver.
  • Making decisions for next year without waiting for the fundraising landscape to shift.

This isn’t recklessness. It’s the opposite: it’s seeing the constraints clearly and proceeding with intention alongside them.

The truth is, nonprofit leaders have always operated in uncertain conditions. The difference now is that you’re naming it—and you’re deciding to move forward anyway, not despite the uncertainty, but with full knowledge of it.

Here’s one thing you can count on – Event Strategies For Success has the discipline and rigor to partner with you as you plan your next steps.

Continue to Part 2: “When Hope Coexists With Uncertainty” for how to practice this leadership in real time. Please follow this link.

Monique

Posted on

The Relationship Was Always the Strategy

The Relationship Is Always The Strategy

WHAT GALA SEASON REVEALS ABOUT THE HEALTH OF YOUR DONOR ECOSYSTEM

The event is over. The florals have been cleared. The final revenue report is sitting in your inbox. And if you are honest with yourself — truly honest — something feels slightly off. Not catastrophic. Not a failure by any conventional measure. The room was full. The program was beautiful. The auctioneer did his job. But the energy told a different story. Certain tables felt transactional. A few major donors sent regrets at the last minute. The board is asking questions you are not entirely sure how to answer.

You find yourself wondering if the problem is the event.

It is not.

It never was.

“Your gala does not create relationships. It reveals them.”

THE GALA IS NOT THE PROBLEM

Your Event Is a Mirror, Not a Magic Wand

Here is what no one in the events industry will tell you plainly enough: your gala is not a fundraising strategy. It is a relationship report card. Every element of that evening — who came, who gave, who brought others, who renewed at a higher level, who sent regrets, who sat quietly through the program and left without speaking to anyone — is a direct, unambiguous reflection of the relationship infrastructure you have or have not built in the 364 days before the invitation went out.

The gala simply concentrates what already exists into a single, visible, high-stakes evening. If the relationships are deep, the room feels like community. If the relationships are transactional, the room feels like an obligation. No amount of exceptional event design changes that fundamental truth. You cannot produce your way out of a relationship deficit.

This is not a criticism of events. It is a liberation from the wrong conversation. The debate about whether galas work misses the point entirely. Galas work when the relationships work. They struggle when the relationships are thin. The event was never the variable. The relationship always was.

WHAT RELATIONSHIP AS STRATEGY ACTUALLY MEANS

Beyond Stewardship. Beyond the Thank-You Call.

When most organizations talk about donor relationships they mean stewardship — the thank you letter, the impact report, the annual luncheon, the birthday acknowledgment in the database. These things matter. They are not, however, a relationship strategy. They are the minimum viable expression of gratitude. Gratitude and strategy are not the same thing.

Relationship as strategy means something more structural and more intentional. It means your major donors feel genuinely known — not just thanked. Their values, their interests, their networks, their capacity, their vision for what is possible in this community. It means your board members are not just governing your organization — they are actively connecting it to the relationships that will carry it forward. It means the ask, when it comes, is not an introduction. It is a continuation.

The organizations that consistently outperform their peers in the fundraising room are not the ones with the most sophisticated event production. They are the ones whose donors arrived at the event already invested — already part of the story, already proud to be in that room, already planning to bring someone next year. That does not happen because of a beautiful centerpiece. It happens because of what was built long before the save-the-date was designed.

“The ask should never be the introduction.”

A WORD FOR THE BOARD

Revenue Is a Lagging Indicator. Relationship Is the Leading One.

Board members, this section is specifically for you — and it is offered with the deepest respect for the governance role you carry.

When you evaluate the success of your organization’s gala, the instinct is to go directly to the number. Did we hit the goal? Did we exceed last year? What was the cost-per-dollar-raised? These are legitimate questions. They are also, by themselves, insufficient ones.

Revenue is a lagging indicator. It tells you what happened as a result of decisions and investments made months or years ago. It is the last thing to show up and often the last thing to reflect the true health of your donor ecosystem. By the time the revenue tells you something is wrong, the relationship has been struggling for a while.

The leading indicator is the relationship. Ask instead: Are our major donors deepening their investment year over year? Are board members actively opening doors and making introductions? Are new donors entering our ecosystem through the relationships of existing ones? Is our community growing because people feel genuinely connected to this mission — or are we starting from scratch every season?

Those questions tell you where you are actually headed. The number only tells you where you have been.

“The revenue from your gala is a report card on your relationships — not your event.”

THE HALF YEAR MOMENT

The Second Half of Your Fiscal Year Is Still Yours

We are at the midpoint of the fiscal year for many organizations. Which means one of two things is true right now. Either you are on track and the relationships that will carry you to a strong close are already in motion — in which case this is a moment to deepen what is working. Or something feels uncertain, and the instinct is to plan harder, execute faster, and push the next event to do more heavy lifting than it was designed to carry.

If the second is true, I want to offer you a reframe.

The second half of your fiscal year is not primarily a revenue challenge. It is a relationship opportunity. There is still time — not to plan a better event, but to have the conversations that make the next event mean something. To call the donor who has been giving at the same level for five years and ask what they are seeing in the community. To convene the board around a question rather than a report. To bring a prospective major donor into the mission in a way that makes the eventual ask feel like a natural next step rather than a transactional moment.

The organizations that will close this fiscal year with momentum and enter the next one with confidence are not the ones that executed the most flawless events. They are the ones that spent the second half of the year doing the quiet, intentional, often invisible work of building the relationships that make everything else possible.

That work does not happen by accident. It happens by design. And design — thoughtful, strategic, relationship-centered design — is exactly what separates organizations that react from organizations that lead.

“The second half of your fiscal year is a relationship opportunity, not just a revenue target.”

THE CASE FOR DEEPER ALIGNMENT 

The Organizations That Will Win This Year Already Know This

The most important question you can ask as you move through the second half of this fiscal year is not “How do we make the next event better?” It is “How deep are our relationships right now — and are they deep enough to carry us where we need to go?”

If you can answer that question with confidence, you are already leading from the right place. If the question gives you pause — if there is even a moment of uncertainty about the health of your donor ecosystem, the engagement of your board, or the relationship infrastructure beneath your next major event — that pause is important information.

It is not a sign that something is broken. It is a sign that something is ready to be built.

The relationship was always the strategy. The organizations that understand that — and act on it with intention — are the ones that do not just survive gala season. They thrive beyond it.

If you are not sure where your relationships stand — that is the conversation worth having.

Monique

Posted on

The Courage to Be Seen in 2026: A Leadership Reflection

For women leading in nonprofits—and anyone who has ever edited their leadership presence.

Dear Friends and Colleagues,

As we approach 2026, I’ve been reflecting on leadership presence in mission-driven work—what it requires, what it communicates, and what happens when we feel pressured to diminish it.

Not because we lack confidence.
Not because we lack competence.
But because we’ve learned—often subtly, sometimes painfully—that visibility can invite scrutiny, misinterpretation, or rejection.

And in mission-driven work, many of us are taught to believe that service and visibility are incompatible.

That if we shine too brightly, it becomes “too much.”
That when we carry ourselves with elegance, it might be read as unserious.
That if we speak with conviction, we’ll be labeled difficult instead of decisive.

First we edit. When that doesn’t work, we soften and over-explain. All of it serves one goal: to stay careful.

I know this dynamic because I’ve lived it.

I’m writing this as a reflection, but also as a truth I’ve had to learn firsthand. This is not a hypothesis for me. It’s lived experience. I’ve navigated seasons where my strengths were valued—until a shift in leadership made those same strengths feel “wrong.” I internalized feedback that was delivered without care, and it took time to realize the problem wasn’t my capability—it was the culture around me.

The Shift

There was a season when my approach worked—until a leadership shift changed what was rewarded. Suddenly, the same instincts that had served the mission were treated as missteps. The feedback came without nuance, and because the culture reinforced a single way of thinking, I began to believe I was always the problem.

It took maturity—and distance—to see that the issue wasn’t my competence. It was the environment. In an echo chamber, one style of leadership becomes the only acceptable one—and anything different gets framed as “wrong.”

That experience changes you. If you’re not careful, it doesn’t just influence how you lead—it begins to shape how you see yourself.

Presence Is Not Separate From Leadership

Your presence is not a distraction from the mission.
It is part of how the mission is carried.

Your joy is not frivolous.
Your refinement is not excessive.
Your voice is not too much.
Your desire for beauty, clarity, and excellence is not a liability.

Many nonprofit leaders—especially women—have been conditioned to believe that the safest path is to be endlessly capable and quietly invisible.

But you were never meant to disappear inside the work.

The Difference Between Being Managed and Being Led

One of the reasons “editing ourselves” becomes so common is that many nonprofit environments confuse management with leadership—and when that happens, the culture often rewards compliance over clarity.

Here’s a simple distinction that has helped me:

  • Management protects the mission through clarity: plans, timelines, roles, and follow-through.
  • Leadership advances the mission through meaning: direction, alignment, courage, and culture.
  • The healthiest organizations need both—and they need them in the right order: direction first, then execution.

When leadership is strong, people feel oriented. They understand what matters, why it matters, and how their work connects to something larger.

When management is strong, people feel supported. They know what “done” looks like, how decisions are made, and what will keep the work moving.

But when either is missing—or when management becomes a substitute for leadership—people often start performing “acceptable” instead of practicing real leadership.

A Question to Carry Into 2026

If you’ve ever felt yourself shrinking in a room you were qualified to lead, consider this:

Where have I been editing myself—and what would shift if I didn’t?

Not in a performative way. Not as a loud reinvention. But as a steady decision to show up with less self-protection and more self-respect.

That might look like:

  • speaking with clarity instead of cushioning every point,
  • trusting your expertise without over-defending it,
  • allowing your presence to be intentional—not apologetic,
  • choosing rooms where your fullness is welcomed, not managed.

A Closing Thought

The most meaningful leadership shift many of us make isn’t about strategy. It’s about permission.

Permission to be seen.
Permission to be taken seriously without becoming smaller.
Permission to lead fully—without dimming.

And if you’re reading this and thinking, “This feels personal,” you’re right.

I’m writing it for you.
And I’m writing it for myself, too.

Fondly,
Monique

Posted on

Help Wanted — The Art of Asking (and Receiving)

Dear Friends and Colleagues,

Today on the Event Strategies for Success blog, our consulting partner Lynette Battle returns with a timely reflection for the fall season — “The Art of Asking (and Receiving) Help.”

The right kind of help can be the bridge between challenge and clarity — or the connection that carries us from uncertainty to confidence. Whether it comes through a trusted mentor, a thoughtful colleague, or a timely resource, help done well doesn’t just solve problems; it strengthens relationships.

Lynette reminds us that in nonprofit work — and in life — help is a beautiful thing, but clarity matters. Read more to explore how to reach out, ask with intention, and receive with grace when the moment calls.

Dear Colleagues,

Working in nonprofit spaces teaches you a lot about the art of asking for help. It’s part of the territory. Whether it’s for volunteers, donations, partnerships, or a last-minute save at an event — calls for help are constant. And like many of you, when I feel compelled, I show up. No fanfare, no strings. I roll up my sleeves and get to work. That’s just who I am. And I know I’m not alone.

Most people who step up to help do so from a place of genuine spirit. When they feel called, they answer — bringing with them their time, talent, and whatever resources they can muster. It’s one of the most beautiful things about humanity: when the spirit moves, we move.

But there’s an important lesson, one that bears repeating for anyone — especially those in leadership roles:
When you ask for help, be clear about what help looks like.

Too often, someone responds to a call for help with everything they have — only to be met with disappointment, frustration, or even blame because it wasn’t “the right kind” of help.  Maybe they donated time when you wanted money. Maybe they offered advice when you wanted action. Maybe they showed up differently than you envisioned.

Here’s the hard truth:
If you don’t define the ask clearly, you can’t fault someone for how they show up.

This isn’t just a nonprofit thing — it’s a life thing. In business, in friendship, in everyday moments — clarity matters. When help is vague, expectations go unmet. And when people who genuinely want to support feel criticized, it doesn’t just sting — it sticks. Some may walk away defeated, others angry, and sadly, some may decide not to step up again at all.

So, if you’re making the call:

  • Be specific about what you need.
  • Be clear about the deliverable.
  • Be honest about the timeline.
  • And be gracious, even if what someone offers looks different than you envisioned.

Because sometimes, the best help isn’t exactly what you imagined — but it’s exactly what you needed.

Help is a gift. Treat it like one. And when you ask, honor the hands that are willing to reach out and lift you up.

To download this infographic, please click below.

Infographic – The Art of Asking for Help v 3Download

Tips to Master the Art of Asking for Help

(1) Be Specific with Your Ask

Vagueness is the enemy of progress. Saying “I need help with my event” is too broad. Say instead: “I’m looking for someone to help manage registration from 10 AM to 12 PM. Can you take that on?”

Why it matters:
People are more likely to say yes when they know exactly what’s needed.

(2) Be Honest About What You Really Need

Are you looking for time, money, a skill, a connection, or simply a listening ear? Don’t sugarcoat the ask. “I need someone to review this grant with me — not just moral support, but actual line-by-line edits.”

Why it matters:
Misalignment between what’s asked and what’s delivered can lead to tension or disappointment.

(3) Understand Capacity Before Assuming Capability

Not everyone who wants to help can help in the way you envision. Ask with flexibility and empathy. “If you don’t have time to volunteer, would you be open to making an introduction to someone else?”

Why it matters:
You honor the relationship and expand your network at the same time.

(4) Say What Help Isn’t

Sometimes it’s just as helpful to say, “I don’t need you to donate — I need you to repost this campaign,” or “I’m not looking for advice, just a listening ear.”

Why it matters:
It keeps everyone on the same page and avoids well-meaning but unhelpful actions.

(5) Don’t Micromanage Generosity

If someone shows up in good faith, receive their help with grace — even if it’s not exactly your way. If it’s off-track, redirect kindly and early. “Thank you so much — this is great. Would you mind adjusting XYZ to better align with what we’re aiming for?”

Why it matters:
How you treat people after they say yes determines if they’ll say yes again.

(6) Express Gratitude Publicly and Privately

Whether someone helped a little or a lot — recognize it. Send the thank you. Tag them in the post. Mention their name in the room.

Why it matters:
Appreciation builds a culture where people feel safe and want to help again.

(7) Reflect Before You Request Again

After each ask, take time to reflect: Was I clear? Did I respect people’s time? Did I accept help with humility? This builds your reputation as someone who leads with integrity.

Why it matters:
Sustainable support is built on trust and clarity, not just urgency.

Please remember, we are here to support you on your fundraising journey. Also please download the infographic and keep it handy! Here’s to your success!

In Community,
Lynette Battle

Posted on

From Awareness to Action: The Continuing Challenge of Breast Cancer in Our Communities

Dear Friends and Colleagues,

Every October, the pink ribbons appear — a visual impetus to remember, reflect, and recommit. But awareness is only the beginning. Behind every symbol lies critical work: the research, the innovation, the clinical trials, the accessible treatment pathways.

Why It Matters — Beyond Awareness

  • In the U.S. in 2025, ACS estimates there will be approximately 316,950 new cases of invasive breast cancer in women, plus another 59,080 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). American Cancer Society
  • Sadly, an estimated 42,170 women are expected to die from breast cancer this year. American Cancer Society
  • While incidence has been rising — about 1% per year in the last decade — death rates have declined (thanks in part to early detection and better therapies). PubMed
  • Still, disparities persist. For example, Black women face higher mortality rates at every age group, often due to late diagnosis or limited access to care. American Cancer Society

These numbers are not just statistics. They are lived stories — of families and communities, especially in historically underserved neighborhoods across NYC.

The Role of Research & Treatment Innovation

Research is what turns hope into results — and it depends on sustained investment. Here are some of the levers:

  • The ACS currently funds scientists across the country for breast cancer research, supporting basic science, translational work, and clinical trials. American Cancer Society
  • In 2023, ACS’s allocation to treatment research (extramural) reached over $56 million — that’s investment into therapies, protocols, and improved patient care. American Cancer Society
  • On the state side, the Wadsworth Center (NYS DOH) includes breast cancer research in its extramural funding programs. Wadsworth Center
  • Local NYC cancer centers are not only treating but driving clinical trials and research:
    • Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center has programs focused on breast cancer and benefits from significant NIH funding. Wikipedia
    • Montefiore Einstein runs hundreds of trials and research programs throughout NYC. Montefiore Einstein
    • The Tisch Cancer Institute’s outreach spans all five boroughs, connecting community, data, and research. Icahn School of Medicine

These institutions create the pipeline from discovery to healing — from lab bench to bedside. But they need both public and philanthropic support to scale and sustain their work.

What We Can Do — Together

  1. Raise mindful awareness — not just symbolic, but informed. Share credible data, highlight disparities, uplift local institutions.
  2. Support organizations strategically — ACS, local cancer foundations (e.g. Cancer Research & Treatment Fund in NYC) CR&T, or cancer centers with strong clinical trial arms.
  3. Advocate for equitable access — especially in communities where screening, early detection, and treatment are less accessible.
  4. Center lived experience — elevate the voices of survivors, caregivers, and communities, especially those historically marginalized.
  5. Encourage public policy that sustains funding — cutbacks to agencies like the National Cancer Institute can jeopardize innovation progress. (For instance, a proposed FY2026 budget outlined significant reductions to NCI funding.) ACS CAN

Final Reflection

Awareness without action is incomplete. In October and beyond, let us use our platforms — our networks, our influence, our storytelling — to stand beside those who fight this disease every day. To advocate that discovery, access, and equity matter. And to ensure that no ribbon remains a symbol without substance.

With deep gratitude and commitment,

Monique 

Posted on

Mentorship & Fundraising: The Ultimate Power Duo for Strengthening Underserved Communities

Dear Friends and Colleagues,

At Event Strategies For Success, we’re always exploring forward-thinking approaches to nonprofit development and leadership.

Today, we’re pleased to share a new contribution from Lynette Battle, one of our esteemed consulting blog contributors, who offers timely insights in her latest article, “Mentorship & Fundraising.”

As the nonprofit sector continues to evolve, voices like Lynette’s help illuminate the importance of meaningful relationships and long-term vision in development strategy. We hope her perspective inspires new ways to move you and your organization #beyondfundraising.

Fondly,
Monique Brizz-Walker

Mentoring & Fundraising
By Lynette Battle

Fundraising and development are always evolving—new trends, new technologies, and, of course, new challenges. But guess what? You don’t have to navigate it alone.

This is the perfect time to embrace mentorship as a game-changing strategy for nonprofit success, particularly for organizations serving historically under-served communities.

Why Mentorship Matters for Nonprofit Fundraisers

For decades, grassroots and community-based organizations led by and for Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC), women, and other marginalized groups have faced systemic barriers in philanthropy—from limited access to donor networks to underfunding despite demonstrated impact. Many nonprofits must work twice as hard to secure the same resources as larger institutions.

This is where mentorship becomes a powerful tool.

Mentorship is more than guidance—it’s collaboration. When experience meets fresh ideas, innovative solutions emerge.

  • Seasoned professionals bring wisdom, strategic insight, and an “I’ve-seen-it-all” perspective.
  • Emerging leaders introduce new tools, digital trends, and creative engagement strategies for donors.
  • Together, they form a dynamic team, making fundraising stronger, smarter, and more sustainable.

🔹 Looking for a Mentor? Start Here.

If you’re seeking mentorship in major gifts, grant writing, donor retention, or nonprofit leadership, here’s how to get started:

✔ Define what you need – Are you looking for strategic advice, donor engagement strategies, or event fundraising guidance?
✔ Be specific with your ask – Instead of “Can you mentor me?” try “I admire your donor engagement work—can we chat about stewardship strategies?”
✔ Offer value in return – Even seasoned pros appreciate fresh perspectives on tech tools, AI in fundraising, and social media strategies.
✔ Leverage your network – Reach out to colleagues, professional groups, or LinkedIn connections.

Consider these mentorship programs:

🔹 Want to Mentor Someone? Here’s How.

If you have expertise in leadership, donor stewardship, or navigating major fundraising campaigns, consider mentoring an emerging nonprofit leader.

✔ Identify what you can offer – Your knowledge could transform how someone else approaches fundraising.
✔ Create structure – Set expectations on meeting frequency and communication style.
✔ Stay open to learning – Reverse mentorship is real! Younger professionals bring fresh insights on AI, social media, and digital fundraising trends.
✔ Join a mentorship program 

Consider participating in:

Mentorship as a Social Justice Strategy

For nonprofits serving historically underserved communities, mentorship is more than career development—it’s a strategy for equity.

By helping underrepresented leaders gain access to networks, funding strategies, and the wisdom of experienced fundraisers, we can level the playing field and build sustainable organizations that continue making an impact.

At the end of the day, fundraising thrives on relationships. And what’s a better relationship than one where both people grow, learn, and make each other better?

🌟 Join the #March-APRILMentorshipChallenge!

This month, I challenge you to take one bold step toward mentorship—as a mentor, mentee, or both!

Here’s how to participate:

✅ Week 1: Identify Your Role

  • Are you looking for a mentor? Or are you ready to share your expertise with an emerging nonprofit leader?

✅ Week 2: Make the Ask

  • If you need a mentor: Send a message to someone you admire (via LinkedIn, email, or a professional group).
  • If you’re offering mentorship: Post online or in a nonprofit group saying you’re available for a 15-30 min chat with an emerging leader.

✅ Week 3: Schedule & Show Up

  • If you connected with someone last week, set up your first coffee chat, Zoom call, or meeting.

✅ Week 4: Reflect & Share

  • Post about your experience using #MarchAprilMentorshipChallenge and tag someone who inspired you this month!

🎯 Bonus Challenge:
✔ Attend a nonprofit networking event and make a new connection.
✔ Introduce someone in your network to a potential mentor or mentee.
✔ Share a key fundraising insight with a newer professional.

By the end of April, you’ll have expanded your network, deepened your knowledge, and helped strengthen the nonprofit fundraising community!

🌱 So, let’s move forward—together. If you’ve had an amazing mentor (or mentee), drop a comment and share what made the experience so impactful.

Who’s in? Drop a 🙌🏾 in the comments and let’s strengthen nonprofit fundraising—one relationship at a time! 🚀

#MentorshipMatters #MarchAprilMentorshipChallenge

Posted on

The Crisis Begins: Damage Control & Reputation Management

Dear Friends and Colleagues,

As we conclude our series, “The Crisis Begins – Identifying the Warning Signs,” we focus on critical reputation management strategies after significant event challenges. Together with the volunteer group, we have reviewed and proactively addressed these challenges to help restore trust and guarantee future events have a robust blueprint to follow when faced with roadblocks.

Immediate Response and Effective Communication

After the event, our joint priority was to swiftly tackle stakeholder concerns. We crafted strategic communications the group can use to manage perceptions and outline the steps to solve immediate issues. We believe proactive communication is vital for maintaining stakeholder trust. To learn more about suggestions we offered in “real time” we invite you to read our most recent post Crisis Response: Taking Control of the Narrative.

Strategic Financial Review and Future Planning

We conducted a financial review to understand budget impacts and improve future event planning. Our suggestions include:

  • Developing a detailed event planning guidebook with budget templates and vendor lists.
  • Enhancing fundraising strategies to include diversified sponsorship and advertising approaches.

Vendor Accountability and Enhanced Venue Choice

We are committed to supporting rigorous vendor evaluations and selecting venues that improve event execution. Our focus includes:

  • Formal vendor debriefs to ensure accountability, guiding the volunteers on how to conduct these assessments.
  • Choosing venues that meet all logistical and accessibility needs, ensuring all guests have a seamless experience.

Pre-Event Marketing, On-Site Signage & Hospitality Needs

Effective marketing before and during the event is crucial. We made the following suggestions to the Chair:

  • Get an early start on designing promotional materials like banners and directional signage.
  • Create a dedicated on-site hospitality team to manage VIP meet and greets without distracting the event’s leadership team.

Understanding the Shift in Venue and Management Dynamics

Our recent experience highlighted the challenges of shifting venue dynamics. Despite successfully managing this event independently in a supportive space for the past two years, a shifting to a new space posed new challenges. This year’s venue, while managed by a capable team, did not offer the full support needed to underpin a convention of nearly 400 attendees.

Leadership and Decision Making

The decision to move the event, while well-meaning, resulted in unforeseen complications. This situation illustrates the importance of stability and continuity in venue choice, which should not be exposed to frequent changes.

It is crucial that the Convention Chair has the authority to make final decisions based on strategic considerations rather than changing preferences, ensuring the sustainability and success of future events.

Parting Thoughts

This series has taught focused on ways to adeptly navigate complex event challenges. Our posts have highlighted “The 8 Pillars of Crisis Management for Impactful Nonprofit Events,” refining our strategies across various facets of event planning.

Extra insights can also be found in earlier articles in this series, including: “The Art and Precision in Event Planning: Identifying the Early Warning Signs,” and “The Moment the Pressure Mounts: Navigating Challenges and Expectations,” each providing a foundation for understanding and improving our practices.

Reflective Questions:

  • How can improved planning and communication prevent future crises?
  • How can budgets be used as guardrails to ensure the event stays on track?
  • How can you design an event so that an audience with varying mobility challenges feels welcomed and not like an afterthought?
  • How can you create a fundraising agenda to support your efforts.

Thank you for your engagement and feedback as we strive to enhance our event management practices. Your insights are invaluable as we continue to learn and grow from each event.

If you have questions, please reach out to us by leaving a comment below.

Here’s to your success!

Monique

Posted on

Crisis Response – Taking Control of the Narrative

Dear Friends and Colleagues,

Welcome back to our ongoing series, “The Crisis Begins – Identifying the Warning Signs.” In this third installment, we think about the day of the event, which, while planned to perfection, faced several setbacks that tested our resilience and decision-making.

Event Day Reflections: Adjusting Expectations Amidst Setbacks

The day promised excitement and connectivity but was tempered by several logistical and service challenges that influenced the overall experience.

Key issues included:

  • Culinary Disappointments: Despite earlier successes with our chosen caterer, this year saw a decline in both the quality and quantity of food. Portions were noticeably smaller, and the presentation did not meet our established standards. Critical feedback from attendees highlighted these discrepancies, notably during the lunch service which did not show the high quality of past offerings.
  • Accessibility and Venue Limitations: The venue, while visually appealing, presented significant logistical challenges. With only one operational elevator, located far from the main event areas, many attendees, including VIPs, encountered difficulties. The venue’s layout necessitated frequent movement across multiple floors, further complicating guest mobility.

Managing Public Perception vs. Internal Realities

As challenges unfolded, our team managed the divergence between the behind-the-scenes realities and the public face of the event. Maintaining a positive external perception was crucial, even as we navigated these internal challenges. This delicate balance involved real-time logistical adjustments and ongoing communication with attendees to manage expectations and mitigate dissatisfaction. Allies proved invaluable in ensuring that quiet concerns did not escalate into public discontent.

The Role of Effective Communication: Strengthening Post-Event Narratives

Real-time communication strategies were adjusted post-event to address and clarify the day’s issues. While early suggestions for a proactive communication memo were set aside by leadership due to concerns about exacerbating disappointment, the need for clear post-event communication became obvious. This shift highlights how crucial it is to give clarity and lead from a position of strength after challenges have arisen.

Key Takeaway: The Power of Proactive Crisis Communication

The experiences of the day highlighted the indispensable value of being prepared for crises. By establishing comprehensive communication strategies beforehand, we can better manage event narratives and keep the integrity of our efforts. This proactive approach ensures that challenges are managed effectively and that our commitment to excellence is clearly communicated.

Reflective Questions to Consider:

  • What strategies can be implemented to better prepare for unforeseen challenges during an event?
  • How can event planners enhance their crisis communication plans to effectively manage public perception both during and after an event?
  • What role does staff training play in ensuring that everyone is equipped to handle crises as they unfold?

As we look ahead to our next post, “Damage Control & Reputation Management,” we will explore the strategies we recommended to restore trust and manage the event’s reputation in its aftermath.

Stay tuned as we continue to navigate these complex waters, learning and growing with each challenge we face.

Also, we’d love to hear from you. Leave a comment to let us know what resonated with you.

Here’s you your success!

Monique

Posted on

The Moment the Pressure Mounts – Navigating Challenges and Expectations

Dear Friends and Colleagues,

Thank you for tuning in for the second article in our series, “The Crisis Begins – Identifying the Warning Signs.”  This week, we delve into how “The Pressure Mounts” in the thick of event planning. This post highlights pivotal moments where resilience and decision-making are tested.  

The Breakdown of Catering Negotiations

Initially marked by past success, our event’s partnership with the catering team faced unforeseen financial discrepancies this year.  Despite a $5,000 increase in our budget, amounting to a 25-30% hike, it proved insufficient due to unexpected logistical needs and venue changes. 

Different table sizes required new linen rentals—a cost neither the host nor caterer anticipated and couldn’t absorb. Additionally, the promised quality and quantity of food diminished. The once bountiful chicken and fish entrees were replaced with portions that seemed to echo our tightened budget, leaving our guests underwhelmed.

Venue Limitations and Logistical Challenges

While visually appealing, the venue couldn’t support our logistical needs effectively.  Outside event hosts are never permitted to use crucial kitchen facilities, a stark contrast to the prior year’s accommodation. This forced the caterer to rely solely on external resources for basic needs like heating food, further straining our already limited budget.

Pivotal Moments and Decision-Making Under Pressure

A defining moment occurred during a pre-event discussion that laid bare the misalignment between our expectations and the caterer’s interpretation of the contract.  The caterer did mention that circumstances would change; yet, they did not fully document these changes in writing or offer prepared alternatives, which led to heightened tensions and a last-minute scramble to adjust plans.

Conclusion:

This episode in our event saga reminds us of the crucial need for vigilance in contract negotiations and the importance of clear, ongoing communication.  As we continue to navigate these turbulent waters, we must also prepare to adapt swiftly and effectively.

Reflective Questions to Consider:

  • How can event planners guarantee vendor agreements are robust enough to handle unexpected changes?
  • How can we improve our crisis management skills to better handle similar pressures in the future?
  • What strategies can be employed to keep high service standards despite budget constraints?

Stay tuned for our next post, “Crisis Response – Taking Control of the Narrative,” to explore how to reclaim control and steer your event back on course despite overwhelming odds.

Here’s to your success.

Monique 

error: Content is protected !!